Shopping Cart 0
Cart Subtotal
AED 0

Marcellus and Utica Shales in the US, 2019 - Gas Shales Market Analysis and Outlook to 2023

Restricted to one authorized user; Open on 1 PC/ mobile / Tablet only.
Print Option: Yes
Copy Option: No
Deliverable Format : PDF Via Email

Single User License
AED 14676

Restricted to one authorized user; Open on 1 PC/ mobile / Tablet only.
Print Option: Yes
Copy Option: No
Deliverable Format : PDF Via Email

Site License
AED 29353

Multiple Users within the Company/ Enterprise
Print Option: Yes
Copy Option: Yes
Deliverable Format : Excel, PDF Via Email

Corporate User License
AED 44029

Details

Marcellus and Utica Shales in the US, 2019-Gas Shales Market Analysis and Outlook to 2023

Summary

The US Appalachian Basin located in Pennsylvania, Ohio, West Virginia and New York continues to be the driver in natural gas production within the United States. During May 2019, it produced around 31 billion cubic feet per day (Bcfd) and is forecast to reach a rate of approximately 35 Bcfd by the end of 2019. The basin comprises the two main formations-the Marcellus, and the Utica. The majority of the activity in the Marcellus continues to take place in north east and south west Pennsylvania while the hotspot for the Utica is in eastern Ohio. Fracking activity in the Marcellus and Utica formations is driven by the large demand for natural gas from the nearby populated areas and although natural gas prices have experienced some volatility during recent years, Appalachian producers are generally able to sell their natural gas at a premium in trading hubs located in the North East. The competitive landscape of the Marcellus play is largely dominated by EQT Corp., the largest natural gas producer in the US, whereas, Ascent Resources LLC and Gulfport Energy Corp. lead the natural gas production in the Utica play.

Scope

The report analyzes the natural gas appraisal and production activities in the Marcellus and Utica shale plays. The scope of the report includes-

- Comprehensive analysis of natural gas production across major counties in Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio, and New York during 2013-2018, as well as production outlook from 2019 to 2023

- In-depth information of well permits issued in the Pennsylvania region of the Marcellus and Utica shale, by county and by company from January 2018 to March 2019

- Detailed understanding of IP rates and type well profiles in Marcellus and Utica formations

- Exhaustive analysis of competitive landscape in the Marcellus and Utica shale in terms of net acreage, gross production, cost trends and planned investments.

- Comparison of type well economic metrics of major players were also analyzed

- Up-to-date information on major mergers and acquisitions in the Marcellus and Utica shales between 2013 and 2019

- Overview of existing and upcoming pipelines and LNG terminals in the Marcellus and Utica.

Reasons to buy

- Develop business strategies with the help of specific insights into the Marcellus and Utica shales

- Plan your strategies based on expected developments of the Marcellus and Utica shales

- Understand the competitive landscape of the companies in the Marcellus and Utica formations

- Keep yourself informed of the latest developments and contracts in these gas-rich shale plays

- Identify opportunities and challenges in the Marcellus and Utica shales in the US.

READ MORE

Table Of Content

Scope

1 Table of Contents

1.1. List of Tables

1.2. List of Figures

2. Overview

2.1. Marcellus and Utica Shales, Recent Developments and Trends

3. Marcellus and Utica Shales, Introduction

3.1. Marcellus and Utica Shales, Overview

4. Marcellus and Utica Shales, Production and Activity Overview

4.1. Marcellus Shale, Production Analysis, 2013-2018

4.2. Utica Shale, Production Analysis, 2013-2018

4.3. Marcellus and Utica Shales, Production Outlook, 2019-2023

4.4. Marcellus and Utica Shales, Drilling Activity, 2018

5. Marcellus and Utica Shales, Competitive Landscape

5.1. Marcellus and Utica Shales, Major Companies by Acreage, 2019

5.2. Marcellus and Utica Shales, Major Companies by Net Production, 2018

5.3. Marcellus and Utica Shales, Future Plans by Major Companies

5.4. Marcellus and Utica Shales, Cost Trends, 2018

6. Marcellus and Utica Shales, Analysis of Top Five Companies

6.1. Marcellus and Utica Shales, Economic Metrics of Major Players

6.2. EQT Corp.

6.3. Antero Resources Corp.

6.4. Cabot Oil & Gas Corp.

6.5. Southwestern Energy Co.

6.6. Range Resources Corp.

6.7. Ascent Resources LLC

6.8. CNX Resources Corp.

7. Marcellus and Utica Shales, Associated Infrastructure

7.1. Pipelines

7.2. LNG

8. Mergers and Acquisition Activity in the Marcellus and Utica Shales, 2013-2019

8.1. Overview of M&A Activity

8.2. Major Acquisitions

9. Appendix

9.1. Abbreviations

9.2. Methodology

9.3. Contact Us

9.4. Disclaimer


List Of Figure

1.2 List of Figures

Figure 1: Northeast Natural Gas Price Differential to Henry Hub, 2016-2019

Figure 2: Relation between Lateral Length and Breakeven Pricing for Major Operators in the Marcellus and Utica Shaless, 2018

Figure 3: Marcellus Shale, Natural Gas Production by County, Pennsylvania, mmcfd, 2013-2018

Figure 4: Marcellus Shale, Natural Gas Production by County, West Virginia, mmcfd, 2013-2018

Figure 5: Marcellus Shale, Natural Gas Production by County, Ohio, mcfd, 2013-2018

Figure 6: Marcellus Shale, Natural Gas Production by County, New York, mcfd, 2013-2017

Figure 7: Utica Shale, Natural Gas Production by County, Pennsylvania, mmcfd, 2013-2018

Figure 8: Utica Shale, Natural Gas Production by County, West Virginia, mmcfd, 2013-2018

Figure 9: Marcellus and Utica Shales, Production Outlook, bcfe, 2019-2023

Figure 10: Marcellus and Utica Shales, Permits Issued and Completed, Jan 2018 to Mar 2019

Figure 11: Marcellus and Utica Shales, Number of Well Permits by County, Pennsylvania, Jan 2018 to Mar 2019

Figure 12: Marcellus and Utica Shales, Number of Well Permits by Operator, Jan 2018 to Mar 2019

Figure 13: Marcellus and Utica Shales, Major Companies by Net Acreage, 2019

Figure 14: Marcellus and Utica Shales, Major Companies by Net Production, 2018 (mboed)

Figure 15: Marcellus and Utica Shales, Well Profile


List Of Table

1.1 List of Tables

Table 1: Type Well Economics Comparison for Selected Areas

Table 2: Marcellus Shale, Natural Gas Production by State, mmcfd, 2013-2018

Table 3: Marcellus Shale, Natural Gas Production by County, Pennsylvania, mmcfd, 2013-2018

Table 4: Marcellus Shale, Natural Gas Production by County, West Virginia, mmcfd, 2013-2018

Table 5: Marcellus Shale, Natural Gas Production by County, Ohio, mcfd, 2013-2018

Table 6: Marcellus Shale, Natural Gas Production by County, New York, mcfd, 2013-2017

Table 7: Utica Shale, Natural Gas Production by State, mmcfd, 2013-2018

Table 8: Utica Shale, Natural Gas Production by County, Pennsylvania, mmcfd, 2013-2018

Table 9: Utica Shale, Natural Gas Production by County, West Virginia, mmcfd, 2013-2018

Table 10: Marcellus and Utica Shales, Production Outlook, bcfe, 2019-2023

Table 11: Marcellus and Utica Shales, Number of Drilling Permits Issued and Completed, Jan 2018 to Mar 2019

Table 12: Marcellus and Utica Shales, Number of Well Permits by County, Pennsylvania, Jan 2018 to Mar 2019

Table 13: Marcellus and Utica Shales, Number of Well Permits by Operator, Jan 2018 to Mar 2019

Table 14: Marcellus and Utica Shales, Major Companies by Net Acreage, 2019 (acres)

Table 15: Marcellus and Utica Shales, Major Companies by Net Production, 2018 (mboed)

Table 16: Marcellus and Utica Shales, Major Companies by Initial Production Rates, 2019

Table 17: Marcellus Shale, Planned Capital Expenditure by Major Companies, 2019 (USD Million)

Table 18: Utica Shale, Planned Capital Expenditure by Major Companies, 2019 (USD Million)

Table 19: Marcellus and Utica Shales, Major Companies by Well Costs, 2018

Table 20: Marcellus and Utica Shales, Major Companies by Type Well Data, 2018

Table 21: EQT Corp., Marcellus and Utica Shales, Key Operational Parameters, 2018

Table 22: EQT Corp. Marcellus and Utica Shales, Key Economics, 2018

Table 23: Antero Resources Corp., Marcellus and Utica Shales, Key Operational Parameters, 2018

Table 24: Antero Resources Corp., Marcellus and Utica Shales, Key Economics, 2018

Table 25: Cabot Oil & Gas Corp., Marcellus Shale, Key Operational Parameters, 2018

Table 26: Cabot Oil & Gas Corp., Marcellus Shale, Key Economics, 2018

Table 27: Southwestern Energy Co, Marcellus and Utica Shales, Key Operational Parameters, 2018

Table 28: Southwestern Energy Co, Marcellus and Utica Shales, Key Economics, 2018

Table 29: Range Resources Corp., Marcellus and Utica Shales, Key Operational Parameters, 2018

Table 30: Range Resources Corp., Marcellus and Utica Shales, Key Economics, 2018

Table 31: Ascent Resources LLC, Utica Shale, Key Operational Parameters, 2018

Table 32: Ascent Resources LLC, Utica Shale, Key Economics, 2018

Table 33: CNX Resources Corp., Marcellus and Utica Shales, Key Operational Parameters, 2018

Table 34: CNX Resources Corp., Marcellus and Utica Shales, Key Economics, 2018

Table 35: Marcellus and Utica Shales, Active, Planned and Announced Pipelines

Table 36: Marcellus and Utica Shales, Major Deals by Oil and Gas Companies, 2013-2019

Licence Rights

Single User License:
Report can be used by individual purchaser only

Site License:
Report can be shared by unlimited users within one corporate location, e.g. a regional office

Corporate User License: 
Report can be shared globally by unlimited users within the purchasing corporation e.g. all employees of a single company

Section Purchase

To know more information on Purchase by Section, please send a mail to support@kenresearch.com

INQUIRE FOR COVID-19 IMPACT ANALYSIS

Company Profile

Company Profile Title

Marcellus and Utica Shales in the US, 2019-Gas Shales Market Analysis and Outlook to 2023

Summary

The US Appalachian Basin located in Pennsylvania, Ohio, West Virginia and New York continues to be the driver in natural gas production within the United States. During May 2019, it produced around 31 billion cubic feet per day (Bcfd) and is forecast to reach a rate of approximately 35 Bcfd by the end of 2019. The basin comprises the two main formations-the Marcellus, and the Utica. The majority of the activity in the Marcellus continues to take place in north east and south west Pennsylvania while the hotspot for the Utica is in eastern Ohio. Fracking activity in the Marcellus and Utica formations is driven by the large demand for natural gas from the nearby populated areas and although natural gas prices have experienced some volatility during recent years, Appalachian producers are generally able to sell their natural gas at a premium in trading hubs located in the North East. The competitive landscape of the Marcellus play is largely dominated by EQT Corp., the largest natural gas producer in the US, whereas, Ascent Resources LLC and Gulfport Energy Corp. lead the natural gas production in the Utica play.

Scope

The report analyzes the natural gas appraisal and production activities in the Marcellus and Utica shale plays. The scope of the report includes-

- Comprehensive analysis of natural gas production across major counties in Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio, and New York during 2013-2018, as well as production outlook from 2019 to 2023

- In-depth information of well permits issued in the Pennsylvania region of the Marcellus and Utica shale, by county and by company from January 2018 to March 2019

- Detailed understanding of IP rates and type well profiles in Marcellus and Utica formations

- Exhaustive analysis of competitive landscape in the Marcellus and Utica shale in terms of net acreage, gross production, cost trends and planned investments.

- Comparison of type well economic metrics of major players were also analyzed

- Up-to-date information on major mergers and acquisitions in the Marcellus and Utica shales between 2013 and 2019

- Overview of existing and upcoming pipelines and LNG terminals in the Marcellus and Utica.

Reasons to buy

- Develop business strategies with the help of specific insights into the Marcellus and Utica shales

- Plan your strategies based on expected developments of the Marcellus and Utica shales

- Understand the competitive landscape of the companies in the Marcellus and Utica formations

- Keep yourself informed of the latest developments and contracts in these gas-rich shale plays

- Identify opportunities and challenges in the Marcellus and Utica shales in the US.

READ MORE

Scope

1 Table of Contents

1.1. List of Tables

1.2. List of Figures

2. Overview

2.1. Marcellus and Utica Shales, Recent Developments and Trends

3. Marcellus and Utica Shales, Introduction

3.1. Marcellus and Utica Shales, Overview

4. Marcellus and Utica Shales, Production and Activity Overview

4.1. Marcellus Shale, Production Analysis, 2013-2018

4.2. Utica Shale, Production Analysis, 2013-2018

4.3. Marcellus and Utica Shales, Production Outlook, 2019-2023

4.4. Marcellus and Utica Shales, Drilling Activity, 2018

5. Marcellus and Utica Shales, Competitive Landscape

5.1. Marcellus and Utica Shales, Major Companies by Acreage, 2019

5.2. Marcellus and Utica Shales, Major Companies by Net Production, 2018

5.3. Marcellus and Utica Shales, Future Plans by Major Companies

5.4. Marcellus and Utica Shales, Cost Trends, 2018

6. Marcellus and Utica Shales, Analysis of Top Five Companies

6.1. Marcellus and Utica Shales, Economic Metrics of Major Players

6.2. EQT Corp.

6.3. Antero Resources Corp.

6.4. Cabot Oil & Gas Corp.

6.5. Southwestern Energy Co.

6.6. Range Resources Corp.

6.7. Ascent Resources LLC

6.8. CNX Resources Corp.

7. Marcellus and Utica Shales, Associated Infrastructure

7.1. Pipelines

7.2. LNG

8. Mergers and Acquisition Activity in the Marcellus and Utica Shales, 2013-2019

8.1. Overview of M&A Activity

8.2. Major Acquisitions

9. Appendix

9.1. Abbreviations

9.2. Methodology

9.3. Contact Us

9.4. Disclaimer


List Of Figure

1.2 List of Figures

Figure 1: Northeast Natural Gas Price Differential to Henry Hub, 2016-2019

Figure 2: Relation between Lateral Length and Breakeven Pricing for Major Operators in the Marcellus and Utica Shaless, 2018

Figure 3: Marcellus Shale, Natural Gas Production by County, Pennsylvania, mmcfd, 2013-2018

Figure 4: Marcellus Shale, Natural Gas Production by County, West Virginia, mmcfd, 2013-2018

Figure 5: Marcellus Shale, Natural Gas Production by County, Ohio, mcfd, 2013-2018

Figure 6: Marcellus Shale, Natural Gas Production by County, New York, mcfd, 2013-2017

Figure 7: Utica Shale, Natural Gas Production by County, Pennsylvania, mmcfd, 2013-2018

Figure 8: Utica Shale, Natural Gas Production by County, West Virginia, mmcfd, 2013-2018

Figure 9: Marcellus and Utica Shales, Production Outlook, bcfe, 2019-2023

Figure 10: Marcellus and Utica Shales, Permits Issued and Completed, Jan 2018 to Mar 2019

Figure 11: Marcellus and Utica Shales, Number of Well Permits by County, Pennsylvania, Jan 2018 to Mar 2019

Figure 12: Marcellus and Utica Shales, Number of Well Permits by Operator, Jan 2018 to Mar 2019

Figure 13: Marcellus and Utica Shales, Major Companies by Net Acreage, 2019

Figure 14: Marcellus and Utica Shales, Major Companies by Net Production, 2018 (mboed)

Figure 15: Marcellus and Utica Shales, Well Profile


List Of Table

1.1 List of Tables

Table 1: Type Well Economics Comparison for Selected Areas

Table 2: Marcellus Shale, Natural Gas Production by State, mmcfd, 2013-2018

Table 3: Marcellus Shale, Natural Gas Production by County, Pennsylvania, mmcfd, 2013-2018

Table 4: Marcellus Shale, Natural Gas Production by County, West Virginia, mmcfd, 2013-2018

Table 5: Marcellus Shale, Natural Gas Production by County, Ohio, mcfd, 2013-2018

Table 6: Marcellus Shale, Natural Gas Production by County, New York, mcfd, 2013-2017

Table 7: Utica Shale, Natural Gas Production by State, mmcfd, 2013-2018

Table 8: Utica Shale, Natural Gas Production by County, Pennsylvania, mmcfd, 2013-2018

Table 9: Utica Shale, Natural Gas Production by County, West Virginia, mmcfd, 2013-2018

Table 10: Marcellus and Utica Shales, Production Outlook, bcfe, 2019-2023

Table 11: Marcellus and Utica Shales, Number of Drilling Permits Issued and Completed, Jan 2018 to Mar 2019

Table 12: Marcellus and Utica Shales, Number of Well Permits by County, Pennsylvania, Jan 2018 to Mar 2019

Table 13: Marcellus and Utica Shales, Number of Well Permits by Operator, Jan 2018 to Mar 2019

Table 14: Marcellus and Utica Shales, Major Companies by Net Acreage, 2019 (acres)

Table 15: Marcellus and Utica Shales, Major Companies by Net Production, 2018 (mboed)

Table 16: Marcellus and Utica Shales, Major Companies by Initial Production Rates, 2019

Table 17: Marcellus Shale, Planned Capital Expenditure by Major Companies, 2019 (USD Million)

Table 18: Utica Shale, Planned Capital Expenditure by Major Companies, 2019 (USD Million)

Table 19: Marcellus and Utica Shales, Major Companies by Well Costs, 2018

Table 20: Marcellus and Utica Shales, Major Companies by Type Well Data, 2018

Table 21: EQT Corp., Marcellus and Utica Shales, Key Operational Parameters, 2018

Table 22: EQT Corp. Marcellus and Utica Shales, Key Economics, 2018

Table 23: Antero Resources Corp., Marcellus and Utica Shales, Key Operational Parameters, 2018

Table 24: Antero Resources Corp., Marcellus and Utica Shales, Key Economics, 2018

Table 25: Cabot Oil & Gas Corp., Marcellus Shale, Key Operational Parameters, 2018

Table 26: Cabot Oil & Gas Corp., Marcellus Shale, Key Economics, 2018

Table 27: Southwestern Energy Co, Marcellus and Utica Shales, Key Operational Parameters, 2018

Table 28: Southwestern Energy Co, Marcellus and Utica Shales, Key Economics, 2018

Table 29: Range Resources Corp., Marcellus and Utica Shales, Key Operational Parameters, 2018

Table 30: Range Resources Corp., Marcellus and Utica Shales, Key Economics, 2018

Table 31: Ascent Resources LLC, Utica Shale, Key Operational Parameters, 2018

Table 32: Ascent Resources LLC, Utica Shale, Key Economics, 2018

Table 33: CNX Resources Corp., Marcellus and Utica Shales, Key Operational Parameters, 2018

Table 34: CNX Resources Corp., Marcellus and Utica Shales, Key Economics, 2018

Table 35: Marcellus and Utica Shales, Active, Planned and Announced Pipelines

Table 36: Marcellus and Utica Shales, Major Deals by Oil and Gas Companies, 2013-2019

Single User License:
Report can be used by individual purchaser only

Site License:
Report can be shared by unlimited users within one corporate location, e.g. a regional office

Corporate User License: 
Report can be shared globally by unlimited users within the purchasing corporation e.g. all employees of a single company

To know more information on Purchase by Section, please send a mail to support@kenresearch.com

INQUIRE FOR COVID-19 IMPACT ANALYSIS